DiscoverFreakonomics Radio
Freakonomics Radio
Claim Ownership

Freakonomics Radio

Author: Stitcher

Subscribed: 311,871Played: 2,522,225


Discover the hidden side of everything with Stephen J. Dubner, co-author of the Freakonomics books. Each week, Freakonomics Radio tells you things you always thought you knew (but didn’t) and things you never thought you wanted to know (but do) — from the economics of sleep to how to become great at just about anything. Dubner speaks with Nobel laureates and provocateurs, intellectuals and entrepreneurs, and various other underachievers. Special features include series like “The Secret Life of a C.E.O.” as well as a live game show, “Tell Me Something I Don’t Know.” 

16 Episodes
Comments (73)

Jason Wilcox

Very interesting conversation. I wasn't aware of the number of job openings out there being about a million higher than the number of unemployed.

Mar 15th


Gee, have an opinion on Trump much? So damn biased...and I didn't even vote for the guy. Come on.

Mar 14th

Austin Peek

It's my honor to have this comment listed as Comment #69 under the Freakonomics podcast. It's a moment I will not ever forget & one I can't wait to share with my unborn son. This was for you, Baby Joey. I hope Daddy made you proud. 😎👌💯👏

Mar 7th

Brian Copanas

Just listened to 'The Future of Meat' .. great balanced story. What is missing from it is details for what other markets were impacted in the 40's as a result of the new textiles, the story of hemp and cannabis. This could be another part of the story that changed the landscape of textiles, the explosion of hemp propaganda and the laws inacted as a result.

Feb 16th

Matthew Mendez

they need to have on Robert Murphy or Peter Schiff

Feb 11th


"Confidence is a choice." Brilliant

Feb 7th

Jake D.

great episode on how to develop a strong mindset

Feb 6th

Shashank Ganesh

when are you releasing your episode with Raghuram Rajan? really looking forward to it. :)

Feb 6th

Ted Jordan

great insights. I agree, college is an unpaid minor league. needs to be fixed

Feb 5th

Marlanda Wing


Feb 3rd

Arturo de la cruz

There's a jump at 30:33 it doesnt sound like it should be there

Jan 31st

Brian Sidiski

Podcast on China eating US jobs referenced in the podcast but is not available. Please re-release. Thanks.

Jan 30th

Partick v.d. E


Jan 25th

Gary Tan

Where's the dislike button? Oh... Unsubscribe

Jan 24th

Surya Rudolph

The more he talks the worst his agenda sounds. this guy has no idea what he is talking about. I wouldn't vote for him.

Jan 23rd

Lisa Lawson

10 NEON 20.18. GOD

Jan 18th

Steve Morrison

, g%us us to somewhere in the

Jan 17th

Paul Kramer

I genuinely feel that many of the reforms Andrew Lang is looking to make can be done in the commercial sector from the commercial sector. The real problem is the ambition education and motivation level of many Americans but also the stresses that are placed on each one. Each of us has to be a banker, tax accountant, psychologist for our children and ourselves, etc. To begin spreading out these responsibilities becomes extremely expensive extremely quickly. I believe that if a company acted like the social welfare branch of the government, where the majority of these responsibilities would be converted to an electronic format with human oversight that the average American would be more free to indulge their time in other activities. A project like this could start as a small company managing integrated bill pay with benefits like group legal, insurance discounts, and perks from other industries which benefit from big Data. eventually it would have evolved into a system where a participant could simply ask the program about a decision and it would show the increase or decrease in the residual payment, the amount of their income which actually gets them at the end of the week or bi-weekly cycle. if the participant finds that money is getting too tight oh, they are then free to go out and find a way to create more income for themselves knowing how much net income they have after all of the things are taken care of, and without taking extraordinary bad risks with their financial future.

Jan 10th

Bailey Lauren Cowell


Jan 6th

Jin ZhiYan

Looking at ep 307, on the qn of why real estate agents still have not been eliminated by markets, I believe a part of the answer was missing. The authors seem to have missed out on a major part of the psyche, of the demands of voters. They have used the efficiency viewpoints of economists, that maybe it's because of the way the market is structured. But it is also very possible that the agent who spends the time with you is able to uncover and express the parameters of your unrecognized needs and wants, and that is the main value they ring, being able to find you houses you would never be able to find for yourself because of different parameters. They also provide you more information through experience and understanding of a particular estate that's missing online. Lastly, they might be worth the trust. For example, Hollywood stars can purchase houses on their own all the time, just go to online sites and key in their requirements. But so many of them still use people because these guys help them understand and introduce to the neighborhood, and are incentivised to bargain for the buyers a good deal to stake out a reputation.

Dec 28th
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store