DiscoverPod Save America“Make America 2016 Again?”
“Make America 2016 Again?”

“Make America 2016 Again?”

Update: 2019-04-25
Share

Description

The President ignores the law and Congress in an effort to shut down further investigations, the federal government is woefully unprepared for future election sabotage, and former Vice President Joe Biden officially enters the Democratic primary. Then Mother Jones’s Ari Berman talks to Dan about the Supreme Court case over Trump’s effort to rig the Census in favor of Republicans. Also – Pod Save America is going on tour! Get your tickets now: crooked.com/events.
Comments (11)

Esther  Lopez

Maybe we should sit back and watch the team of little sharks devour the big shark.

Jun 14th
Reply

Alan Nicholson

So they want people who can't vote and aren't citizens to be counted towards the population that can vote so that those areas can have more representation. How is it fair to take away representation for citizens in favor of non citizens?

May 6th
Reply

jack mchogoff

Alan Nicholson liberalism is a mental disorder

May 6th
Reply

Venice Lockjaw

so does Jon Lovett only come on the podcast for Chelsea handler? is he no longer participating in conversations?

Apr 27th
Reply

Alex Mercedes

yes, Dan (28:10) clear, precise articulation of what drumpf promised and what has actually happened resonates strongly with me. connecting the dots with straight lines seems an effective part of strategy.

Apr 26th
Reply

Kamala Fors Stromwall

Holy crap! How many espressos did Air Berman drink before this interview?

Apr 26th
Reply

Rick Patton

Wow. The hypocrisy is appalling in this episode. They just suggested that, if given to them, Democrats should use materials hacked by Russia. In other words, if Trump accepts foreign help in an election, he must be impeached; if Democrats accept foreign help in an election, that's a necessary and proper tactic.

Apr 26th
Reply

Rick Patton

Alex Mercedes 42:24 - "I think for 100% certainty, Democrats should not use any stolen or hacked materials against OTHER Democrats." 43:12 - "Like let's say we're in a general election, and it's Democratic nominee X against Trump, and somehow someone has hacked Trump's tax returns or other stuff, should a Democrat NOT use that? I'm not so sure about that. [...] I don't feel good about it but this world of unilateral disarmament against Trump, you know, seems...I'm not sure that's wise." *NO* If you believe that what the president did was appalling, damaging, a "crossing the Rubicon" moment endangering the fabric of our democratic Republic...then the answer is not to say "welp, guess it's precedent now so we might as well participate". No. No. The answer is to admonish that action in any and all form and not suggest that there is some moral gray area. This is the danger of painting every situation as existentially dire: if it really is THAT bad, then you're obligated to operate on a "by any means necessary" moral rationale. That's a surefire way to destroy the systems that you claim to fight for.

Apr 27th
Reply

Alex Mercedes

Rick Patton ???where did you hear that suggestion? timestamp please.

Apr 26th
Reply
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

“Make America 2016 Again?”

“Make America 2016 Again?”

Crooked Media